Category: Blog

Have Heart, True Believers

By Ellie, July 7, 2010 10:39 pm

Whew. So many words.

WIP: “Evan & Ronny”
79,422 / 100,000 Words

Writing sci-fi isn’t as sucky as I’d thought. Why, I could design a galaxy just like that shown in Star Wars or Futurama! My characters can planethop to their hearts’ contents, scoping out new landscapes, meeting new alien races, having kick-ass battles in space…

What’s that, Cracked.com? None of it’s possible? No! My dreams! My project! If I publish this, I’ll be laughed at by the science community and other sci-fi writers! I’ll never be taken seriously! I’ve got to follow real world rules, after all. Crap, maybe I should have stuck with just fantasy after all.

But, wait… what’s this? A rash of angry sci-fi fans and space dreamers? They’re disappointed in a Cracked.com article? But Cracked.com articles are the raspberry chocolate cheescakes in a fridge of moldy pizza slices and soggy fries.

Yet I’m curious…

Most of these fall under the presupposition that these hurdles will never be changed. It’s like in the 1800’s when patent offices were closed down–they literally believed nothing new could be invented.

I adore science and I think it has more say than religions do (no offense to those that disagree), but still, science is pretty damn arrogant that it will never change, even though it does and they should know that. Not that its frequent changes discredit it, but assertions are made based on these aspects of science never changing. I am willing to bet my life on the fact that the speed of light will be bypassed. It seems blatantly obvious. Einstein said we couldn’t. So? Why do people give him so much credit? He was a great physicist, but that doesn’t give him authority and ultimate judgment over subjects.

Posted on 6/27/2010 9:17 PM
agamemnon16

So… basically, all the problems on this list could be solved with artificial gravity, continued research and development, and a warp drive.

So really, just continued research and development.

If we could move on from cramped, dank, and disease-ridden pirate ships to humongous luxury cruise liners, I think we can eventually figure out how to make space travel an awesome experience.

Don’t be such a killjoy and have a little faith in Earth’s scientists, won’t you?

Posted on 7/4/2010 5:26 PM
Kaori242

100 years ago learned scientists would have called many of today’s inventions ludicrous, and we laugh at the science fiction our forefathers produced. Who’s to say in the future scientists won’t discover some new aspect of the laws of physics that allows them to build technology that makes space travel comfortable?

I might agree that military starships might be uncomfortable to live in. The US Navy doesn’t build it’s aircraft carriers like a luxury liner – they favor designs that emphasize utility and cost-effectiveness. We can only hope that in the future, comfy leather chairs will be cheap enough that any crewmember can be afforded one.

Posted on 5/26/2010 9:22 AM
Kurzo

I agree with the principle of your argument. I’m sure humanity will eventually find a way to travel across interstellar distances in relative comfort, but that doesn’t mean it’ll be in a comfortable starship. For all anyone alive today knows, we might perfect teleportation or wormhole generation to the point that we don’t even need a ship and can just walk through to another planet (although we’d probably need to send a cramped, uncomfortable ship full of sleeping engineers to the destination to set up things on that end first.)

I’m sure the future will be wild and fantastic beyond what we can imagine now, but that doesn’t mean we’ll “fix” the issues brought up in this article. We might just find a different way to get there.

Posted on 5/26/2010 9:52 AM
Steve-O

All right, so there are a few rules that still need to be followed (humans can only breathe oxygen, a robotic arm can’t lift a two-ton car without its owner wearing some equally strong exoskeleton suit, that kind of stuff), but reading these gives me a lot of hope for my project.

In a way, it’s kind of like having sci-fi fans’ blessings.

Description Overload or Heavy Duty Rewiring?

By Ellie, June 25, 2010 7:03 pm

No Goodreads Friday today. In fact, I’m not sure if I want to contine that cop-out. It’s so damn lazy to scour a review site and paste the text into a blog post, no matter how funny or enlightening it may be. I need to write some quality posts, dammit. Starting today!

During one of my online searches for new books to read, I came across this one: The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains by Nicholas Carr. Here’s what Donna Seaman from Booklist had to say:

[Carr] looks to neurological science to gauge the organic impact of computers, citing fascinating experiments that contrast the neural pathways built by reading books versus those forged by surfing the hypnotic Internet, where portals lead us on from one text, image, or video to another while we’re being bombarded by messages, alerts, and feeds. This glimmering realm of interruption and distraction impedes the sort of comprehension and retention “deep reading” engenders, Carr explains. And not only are we reconfiguring our brains, we are also forging a “new intellectual ethic,” an arresting observation Carr expands on while discussing Google’s gargantuan book digitization project. What are the consequences of new habits of mind that abandon sustained immersion and concentration for darting about, snagging bits of information? What is gained and what is lost?

Whew. After reading that, I began to wonder if I’m becoming one of the “Rewired.”

I just finished Prey, the fourth book in Rachel Vincent’s Shifters series. It’s one of the most action-packed installments yet, with plenty of bitch-slapping, blood splattering, and broken bones. I like action in my stories, and if the violence contributes to the story and helps color it, even better.

But when the description weighs down the action, I start to drift away or rush through the words.

Before I get any angry e-mails, I just want to clarify something: I like Rachel Vincent. When I came across the ARC (advance reader copy) for Stray, the cover photo and copy on the back drew me in. No matter how hard I resisted, I kept picking up that ARC and looking it over. I don’t normally go for paranormal stories; they’ve always rubbed me the wrong way, and with the current masturabating fest over vampires these days, I’m less inclined to venture into that genre. But I took the ARC home and read it in four days. Then I ordered the second book in the series.

No one’s done werecats before. Vincent has created a believable secret society of shifters who are a part of the human world, yet apart from it. In their human forms, these werecats hold ordinary jobs, have human friends, and even go to school. Some male werecats date and marry human women. Females, however, are pressured into marrying, since they’re the only ones capable of passing on the werecat gene. It’s a fascinating yet misogynistic world that the heroine, Faythe Sanders, lives in, and she’s rebelling against what everyone wants for and needs of her. On top of that, her progressive father, the Alpha of their Pride, has designated her to succeed him.

Best of all, there are no fucking vampires. I’m so sick of vampires.

The ARC and first printed edition of Stray exceed 600 pages (subsequent reprints have trimmed the story down to a svelte 400-something tome), but I was eager to move into this urban fantasy. I wanted to learn more about Faythe and cheer her on as she took on sexism and the bad guys. Thing is, because she stands a chance of disappearing along with other fertile tabbies (their word for female werecats), she’s pretty much imprisoned in the family ranch house. But she gets to Shift, prowl around in cat form, be delightfully snarky, and learn more about her missing friends. And we get to meet the Pride, including fan-favorite brother, Ethan, and her jilted ex-boyfriend, Marc, who was forced into werecat-dom through a Stray attack that infected him. But after all this, Faythe does confront the bad guys.

Over 300 pages later.

That’s halfway through the freaking book. Granted, Vincent needed to set up the world and help the reader understand exactly what Faythe has to deal with (and her reasons for running away and enrolling in grad school before the story begins). Plus, it’d be very unrealistic if her family just let her roam around the ranch without any supervision; the grounds aren’t exactly intruder-proof. Honestly, I can’t see any other way she could have written the first half of the story… but then, I haven’t read the 400-page version yet, so I don’t know what she cut out. I imagine that it was a lot of description.

Understandably, in order to create a fictional world, a writer needs to have description. And the better picture it paints, the better. A character can simply walk into a room, or he can saunter into it, maybe even hop into it. How does he handle his wounds? Does he sit silently and gently rub his teeth over his bleeding lip, or does he adopt a grim stance and ignore his firing nerves? What kind of hair does he have? Is it a dull brown or a shiny umber with red highlights that show up in the sun? Without description–excellent description, at that–you have a dull story nobody wants to read.

Vincent pours description into every scene, especially the fights. We get shattered bones, fountains of blood, shocks traveling up limbs with each impact. You can imagine every single move with this kind of description. But after a while, I found it a little overwhelming and ended up skimming. I wanted to know how the skirmish ended and who came out victorious. Personally, I believe action scenes should be short on detail. When the punches start flying, so do my eyes; I want to go as fast as the action, but it’s almost impossible with some scenes in this series.

Now, that doesn’t mean I want to read a scene that goes: “He threw a punch, and the other guy groaned and fell to the floor.” A simple yet vivid “His fist crashed into the goon’s chin, sending him sprawling to the floor with a moist gurgle” would suffice. I don’t need to know how loudly the bone shattered, or how high the blood flew and where it splattered. I like little details woven through the action, not flooding it.

From what I can remember, a lot of the action scenes in Prey described each punch, each weapon hitting its victim, how the victim fell, the associated sound effects… Almost every paragraph seemed to be made of these details, and when the scene stretches over a few pages–with some dialogue thrown in–it becomes a chore to read a scene that would probably happen in less than three minutes in real-time. It’s because of this that I nearly missed one of the most shocking and emotionally-packed moments in the story that happened immediately after a lull in fighting.

That’s one of the dangers of writing. It’s so easy to get carried away with fleshing out a scene that a writer wants to capture every sensation, sight, sound, and smell that’s conjured in the mind. Trust me, I deal with it every day. It’s a struggle to decide how much description should go into a scene and how much I should cut out. And if I think it’s pure gold, the emotional hold on the words is even stronger. Sometimes I give in to my whiny inner-bitch and keep the targeted section, and other times I suck it up and remind myself that the deleted portion will go into a “deleted file.” At least it was written, right? I’ll always have the deleted stuff in some form.

Despite my complaining, I’m not going to drop Rachel Vincent from my to-read bookcase. She has a talent for creating enticing characters, and I like visiting her werecat world.

If anything, reading this series has made me a more cautious writer. Do I really need to describe every finger twitche, every sniffle, and every blink? How much of my dialogue should be pertinent information? How much of the description adds texture, and how much of it bogs down?

But then I wonder how I’ve evolved as a reader. Have I become so used to ridiculously fast-loading Webpages that I expect my reading material to be the same? Have I become impatient, incapable of allowing myself to be completely immersed in a world, only believing that I’ve given myself to another writer when I’m actually skimming the surface and waiting for a chance to break free?

I guess I’ll find out when I read Shift.

In Your Face

By Ellie, June 23, 2010 9:49 am

Getting a bonafide publicist who worked in the publishing industry is one of those once-in-a-lifetime things for me. Living in a small Southern town doesn’t really put one on the path with various individuals who happen to know a thing or two about one’s dream career, you know.

So I was stoked to the point of going into a happy coma when the publicist came to speak at the bookstore. A publicist who worked in New York’s publishing core, at that. If I’m remembering correctly, she’s a native of this area, but went to find work in the Big Apple after graduating college. Her former boss even wrote a book on self-marketing (although it’s intended more for people who’ve already gotten their work published).

I gotta tell you, this was a real eye-opener. No longer am I looking at traditional methods of finding an agent, which consists of querying via snail and e-mail. Agents are scouring the Internet for new talent, sifting through Twitter, Facebook, and personal blogs for creative minds with a built-in audience. Because why bother trying to build a potential moneymaker from the ground up when half the work is already done for you? The Internet is a flood of talent, and only a select few ever get flushed out.

Which means that if I even stand a chance of getting myself out there, I’ve got to venture into another branch of social networking. Namely, Facebook. Or LinkedIn.

I’d been hoping to avoid this. I mean, there are days when I forget I have this blog, because I’m too busy writing my first novel. How can I possibly market myself when I don’t even have a finished product? Why would I need another account that I’ll most likely abandon after a month?

Because that’s where the agents are going. And unfinished projects be damned; if you give people just a taste of your talent, they’ll want to see more. And they just might be willing to take a chance on you and give you a contract.

People are getting discovered online every day. Fanfic writers are becoming bestselling novelists; tween YouTube singers are getting record deals; I wouldn’t be surprised if a Tweeter gets a book deal… and it’s probably already happened.

Desperate or smart? I’ll find out once I get the hang of it.

I’ve already learned that you’ve got to be a member of Facebook in order to view pages, so… Facebook “Ellie Coral,” mmm’kay?

Goodreads… Sunday: Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter

By Ellie, June 20, 2010 11:58 am

No post Friday. I was tired from running around that day… and I was distracted by Friday Night Standup on Comedy Central. They picked out some good ones that night: John Mulaney, Kevin Cease, Joe DeRosa, Kyle Grooms, Kyle Dunningan…

Anyway, this entry from Goodreads spotlights the newest in the “historical figure encounters the fantastical” genre, Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter by Seth Grahame-Smith. This is an unusual book for me because, well… I actually considered reading it, despite my intense loathing for all things vampire (even the non-sparkly stuff) and historical name-dropping (coughAnno Draculacoughgack).

But then I accidentally read a poorly hidden spoiler in one of the reviews and… well, no sense in reading a book where the main character does a 360 at the very end. A very head-bangingly, acid-spittingly stupid 360, at that.

Caitlin rated it: 1 of 5 stars
Read in March, 2010

I didn’t read Pride and Prejudice and Zombies because it seemed kind of gimmicky (not necessarily a terrible thing, but not an awesome thing in a book, either), but mostly because I loathe Jane Austen. Yes, I admit it: I am a Jane Austen loather. You can go ahead and take away my girl credentials now (I really wasn’t using them, anyway). I like my husband’s take on Jane Austen, “They’re books where a couple of really rich people like each other, play hard to get, finally marry and own a third of Europe.” Heh.

Anyway, I like vampires and I like Abraham Lincoln so I figured I’d try this one out. I wish I had liked it, but I really really didn’t. Not even a little bit.

Firstly, I think the elements of a mashup should offer a new way to look at each other. For instance, playing The Dark Side of the Moon over the top of The Wizard of Oz is very very cool, but it also makes you look at elements of each in a new way – that’s part of the coolness, I think. I’m sorry to say that being a vampire hunter doesn’t bring anything useful to my view of Abraham Lincoln nor vice versa. The two things neither complement each other nor utterly destroy each other. Added to that the notion of vampires being behind slavery and the Civil War and I found the whole thing trivializing. The thing that makes slavery horrific is that it’s something that people do to each other – we don’t need monsters for it.

I’d like to say that the author at least managed a creative play on the Doris Kearns Goodwin style of political biography, but I can’t. All told, this wasn’t entertaining and wasn’t enlightening and mostly just sucked.

Author Appeal? What Author Appeal?

By Ellie, June 15, 2010 11:15 pm

You know what’s the hardest part about writing? I mean, besides coming up with a believable plot and engaging character? And stringing together coherent sentences? And keeping track of all the various subplots? Making sure that gun from the first act makes it into the third act?

Okay, you know what’s one of the hardest things about writing? Making sure all your creepy fetishes don’t cram themselves into your work.

Look, we’ve all got them. One man’s foot rub is another man’s path to body-wracking orgasm. One woman’s penchant for spangling bracelets is another woman’s arousal. One woman’s quick trip to the grocery store to pick up a pack of shredded barbecue meat is another woman’s foreplay. Most people are careful not to leak their more unusual interests. While I have nothing against a man literally loving cars, I’m not quite sure how I’d react to actually knowing such an individual. Maybe carefully guard that lever in my car that opens the gas cap.

And then there are my own unique interests. Unconventional ideas that float under the thin membrane of self-control, ready to break the surface and bleed onto the paper, revealing horrible details that could shatter my career. But the temptation is strong. Just as I explore these worlds I’ve created, I’m also exploring my thoughts, prejudices, and desires. My stories are workshops, testing grounds for ideas I can never explore in real life. Society dictates that I keep to myself these shameful thoughts. And yet…

It’s tempting to keep them in these unpublished documents. Tweak them just a little, maybe delete that odd dialogue or inside joke. Make them palatable. But they’re still there. Dare I leave them be and trust that the world will only see them as part of the story? Or will they recognize the despicable?

The desires, they leak from the mind, drop by drop, until they form a lake. Perfect for skinny-dipping. The perfect killing ground as I dive in, exposing everything that could ignite this judgmental world into a riot and incinerate my hopes.

These are secrets I must keep. Secrets that the world must never know.

All right, maybe lusting after chubby men isn’t quite the disgrace that it was a decade ago. But if I ever get published, people are going to start wondering why all these short fatties keep popping up in my work. And why they all prefer boxers. And why they’re all blond or redheaded.

And tall, broad-shouldered guys with freckles. Oh, god, the freckles, all over their smooth backs, matching perfectly with their copper-tinted locks. Gorgeous gingers with boyish grins, their bodies a spectacular game of connect-the-dots.

And the gay men. Yes, so many flavors, all of them tasty and filling. From willowy twinks to macho bears, all of them just ready to confess their love in sappy ways and consummate in various places.

And the balloon-popping robots with Tourette’s Syndrome. Their disdain for anything fleshy, their need to satiate their killing instinct by exploding something rubbery as they curse and twitch and…

Might be a good idea to edit that out in the second draft…

Panorama Theme by Themocracy